You'dn be wrong.
(I like saying You'dn. Yes Mom, I know it's not a word. But I like it, and it's my blog, so there.)
Saddam Hussein's Philanthropy of Terror
by Deroy Murdock , Media Fellow
Hoover Institution at Stanford University
Adapted from a September 22, 2004 presentation at the Hoover Institution
Did he still possess Weapons of Mass Death? Seemingly not, at least not in the quantities America and its allies expected. But wasn't there another reason America and its Coalition partners invaded Iraq? Didn't Saddam Hussein have ties to terrorism?
The notion that he did not is an article of faith among the critics of President Bush, Tony Blair and their allies. Saddam Hussein, they argue, knew little if anything about terrorism, especially al-Qaeda. Listen to a few of these more notable detractors:
"Iraq was not a terrorist haven before the invasion," 5 Democratic candidate John Kerry told Philadelphia voters September 24. At the September 30, 2004 presidential debate, Kerry asserted, "Iraq was not even close to the center of the War on Terror before the president invaded it."
Really John? Perhaps you'd care to explain this table then...
John Kerry is not fit to be our president in this day and age of Islamic terrorism, and SADDAM HUSSEIN WAS ACTIVELY INVOLVED WITH ISLAMIC TERRORISM, AND WAS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES.
How anyone can read this report and think otherwise absolutely BAFFLES me.